Organizational Structure

This segment is characterized by a four-level hierarchical structure:

Level 0: Strategic Layer

  • Role: Takes strategic decisions
  • Responsibility: Sets organizational direction, defines strategic priorities, approves major program initiatives
  • Influence: Steering group or contractor entity that provides overall governance

Level 1: Program Manager

  • Role: Steering on tactical level
  • Responsibility: Allocates resources, manages dependencies between projects, tracks portfolio progress, communicates status to strategic layer
  • Key Activity: Portfolio management across multiple initiatives

Level 2: Facilitator / Project Owner

  • Role: Leads individual projects
  • Responsibility: Day-to-day project management, coordinates team, ensures project aligns with program goals
  • Key Activity: Project execution and team coordination

Level 3: Community Members

  • Role: Contributors
  • Responsibility: Execute project work, provide expertise, contribute ideas
  • Key Activity: Hands-on delivery and innovation

Innovation Management Approach

Theme-Based Clustering

  • Projects are organized around common themes or topics
  • This structure enables cross-project learning and knowledge sharing
  • Related initiatives can inform and support each other

Phase Progression

The program follows a relatively clear sequence of steps:

  1. Incoming: New initiative intake and assessment
  2. Phase 1-5: Structured progression through defined project phases
  3. Status Tracking: To do → In progress → Done

Innovation Hub Concept

  • Central organizing entity coordinating multiple initiatives
  • Multiple parallel projects within themes
  • Visible portfolio management across the program

Key Characteristics

Structural Clarity

  • Hierarchical structure enables clear accountability and decision-making
  • Defined phases reduce ambiguity about project status and next steps
  • Formal governance creates predictability for resource allocation

Cross-Project Synergy

  • Same theme/topic enables projects to learn from each other
  • Shared resources and knowledge reduce duplication
  • Unified portfolio view supports strategic alignment

Coordination Mechanisms

  • Explicit governance between hierarchical levels
  • Phase gates and milestones for progress tracking
  • Program manager role bridges strategic and execution layers

Key Needs & Pain Points

Visibility Challenges

  • Need: Central visibility across all projects, themes, and phases
  • Pain: Fragmented information leads to poor resource decisions
  • Gap: Lack of single source of truth for portfolio status

Governance & Alignment

  • Need: Structured steering without bureaucratic overhead
  • Pain: Informal steering in undercurrents can contradict formal decisions
  • Gap: Information asymmetry between decision-makers

Cross-Project Learning

  • Need: Capture and share learnings between similar initiatives
  • Pain: Projects execute in silos despite shared themes
  • Gap: No systematic mechanism for lateral knowledge transfer

Stakeholder Engagement

  • Need: Proactive information positioning for different decision-makers
  • Pain: Stakeholders rejecting projects due to lack of early involvement
  • Gap: Reactive communication instead of proactive engagement

Personas in This Segment

This segment involves three primary personas:

Platform Opportunities

Portfolio Dashboard

  • Central view of all initiatives with theme grouping
  • Real-time phase status and progress tracking
  • Resource allocation and dependency visualization

Information Positioning

  • Notification system for key stakeholder groups
  • Proactive briefing materials for different decision-maker profiles
  • Early warning system for decision-relevant changes

Cross-Project Learning

  • Theme-based project grouping and comparison
  • Lesson capture and sharing mechanisms
  • Best practice documentation and retrieval

Structured Governance

  • Phase gate and milestone tracking
  • Decision audit trail with rationale capture
  • Stakeholder participation and sign-off workflows